Archive for the ‘Political’ Category

International media: if you’re protesting, then you are Mousavi supporter

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

It seems the international media are of the opinion that if you’re protesting then you must be pro-Mousavi.

Here are some pictures with their respective captions labelling protests as pro-Mousavi.  There are many more then the pictures I’ve cited here, but this is just to give an idea about the spin media are putting on protests in Iran.  I wouldn’t doubt it if they have pictures from this years July 9 uprising (18 tir) with a caption claiming protests support Mousavi.

Perhaps AFP thinks anyone who is out on the streets protesting against the regime is actually pro-regime… er I mean pro-Mousavi.

Supporters of Mir Hossein Mousavi throw stones at Iranian police during a violent demonstration in Tehran on June 20. Iranian opposition leaders have called for the immediate release of hundreds of people arrested in a crackdown on post-election protests and denounced the “brutal attacks” by security forces.(AFP/File)

Supporters of defeated Iranian presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi run past a burning bus in Tehran. Mousavi plans to unveil a new political grouping which will keep up a protest campaign against last month’s disputed presidential election, an aide said on Wednesday. (AFP/File/Olivier Laban-Mattei)

Again, the same formula is used:

Protester = supporter of regime reformists

A supporter of defeated Iranian presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi holds a stone as he stands with fellow demonstrators during riots in Tehran in June 2009. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Wednesday renewed a limited US offer to talk with Iran despite its post-election crackdown and defended the principle of engaging anti-American regimes. (AFP/File/Olivier Laban-Mattei)

How can someone holding the Lion & Sun flag be branded pro-Mousavi?  Mousavi is a creature of the regime, he is by no-means anti-regime having served as the regime’s prime minister.  It is therefore difficult to understand how an icon for resistance like the Lion & Sun flag can be associated with the Islamic Republic reformist to which Mousavi subscribes to.  Difficult to comprehend for you and I, but not for Associated Press.

Demonstrators wave Iranian flags outside the Iranian embassy in Brussels, Saturday June 27, 2009, protesting the outcome of the presidential election in Iran. The demonstrators are expressing solidarity with Iranian opposition leader Hossein Mousavi. (AP Photo/Geert Vanden Wijngaert)

American Thinker interview with MPG Spokesman Nikbakht

Sunday, July 12th, 2009

Here’s a very informative interview with Faryar Nikbakht, with a brief history of opposition leader Roozbeh Farahanipour.

Here’s a an excerpt:

AAL: Will MPG repudiate requirements that non-Muslim women wear veils, and protect all women — especially Muslim women — from coercive attempts to enforce veiling?
FN: Coercive veiling is against our beliefs. Women should be free to go without a hijab or wear a hijab if they like. However women want to [dress], they should be free.
AAL: Persia was once predominantly Zoroastrian. Would MPG encourage a Zoroastrian revival?
FN: A government should not, and may not, advocate or discourage any religion. Everyone should be free to practice their religion. The government should not fund or propagate any religion. Such a government would [only] replace the present one…. Iran’s government now funds their own leaders and even population increase. So long as people support them, [the mullahs] engineer demographics. If any government were to encourage a different religion, that would be equally unfair.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/a_true_iranian_reformer_and_hi.html

Letter from US Congress to State Department about illegal ballot boxes in US

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

FDI: State Department met with Mousavi representative in Dubai

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

Very interesting.

When there is talk of Iranian opposition being helped financially that’s bad - very very bad; but when reformists want to receive financial backing it’s good - very very good.

FDI has a great write-up of the developments taking place to the run-up of the Islamic Republic’s [s]election.

Here’s a excerpt:

According to Saeed Behbehani of MihanTV, a U.S. government emissary met in Dubai two weeks ago with Mehdi Khazali, campaign manager for Mir Hossein Mousavi, bringing assurances of U.S. government support for his campaign. So far, organizations such as “One Million Signatures” inside Iran, which is funded through NGO’s getting State Department fnding, have been mobilized in favor of Mousavi in the election. For 30 years, Iranian women have been knocking their heads on the doors of Western “feminist” organizations, seeking - if not help, at least sympathy. Until now, they have been given the brush-off. But with a “reformist” in the White House, “reformists” in Iran have access s to campaign war chests, VOA Persian Service, National Endowment for Democracy grants, and more.

MPG’s Farahanipour excellent explanation of [s]elections

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

Frontpage magazine conducted a very interesting and detailed interview with Roozbeh Farahanipour, head of Marze Por Gohar Party.

I recommend everyone read it as it contains information that’s rarely, if ever, disclosed about the regime’s [s]elections.

One specific piece I liked, since the American government is turning a blind eye to illegal activities the Islamic Republic is conducting within the United States:

The regime tries to have it both ways: they try to discredit Iranians living outside of Iran who support boycotting by claiming they [boycott supporters] are detached and out of touch, while at the same time they provide logistical support to pro-regime entities living outside Iran to help promote the elections.  The latter is in fact illegal: it is illegal for the Islamic Republic to place ballot boxes in foreign states with which it has no official relations.  Meaning, it is illegal for the Islamic Republic to place ballot boxes in the Unites States and count the votes cast here in the states for the elections in Iran.

But hey, Obama wants to engage the Islamic Republic, so it’s okay if the Islamic Republic breaks American laws within America.

Ebi’s song Tasmim urges boycott of [s]election

Saturday, June 6th, 2009

I’m glad an Iranian singer has decided to use their fame for educating Iranians.

The track’s chorus basically says that when you are choosing between bad and worse its no longer an election.  Basically Ebi is saying boycott the [s]election.

There’s this idea that the reason Ahmadinejad came to power was because Iranians “boycotted”, um… according to the numbers released by the Islamic Republic, last term’s [s]election numbers certainly don’t support this idiotic assertion.

If you compare now the slogans of what Iranians are saying during protests and with what was said four years ago, you’ll definitely notice a shift towards more radical slogans.  There are youtube clips floating around with people yelling “death to the dictator”, “revolution again, again” and “we women and men are are warriors, start the fight so we can end it”.  Why is this significant, because many “experts” claim that Ahmadinejad has drastically stifled dissent, and yet we see an increase in the number of protests and more and more radical slogans being used.

This is a selection, not an election

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

May 31, 2009

The Islamic Republic’s 2009 [s]election is shaping up to be just as it has been before; a “hardliner” wanting to curb “westernization” of Iran and an enlightened “reformist” promising liberal policies. And just as previous [s]elections, the theocracy has put its propaganda machine into overdrive, arguing that to boycott the [s]election means the enemy, which is defined as anyone who is against the Islamic Republic, will win.  In keeping with tradition, the various factions within the regime are receiving various forms of support from foreign forces.

Rafsanjani has gone so far as to spell out explicitly the Islamic Republic’s fears, stating that if less then 40 million Iranians vote, the legitimacy of the regime will come under question and if more then 40 million participate, the regime has insured itself for another four years.  The regime has even lowered the legal voting age to 15 to help bolster voter turnout.  The theocracy’s king, Khamenei, has declared that Iranians must vote so as to provide legitimacy to the ruling clique.

Out of the more then 475 applicants only four were vetted to run for the presidency by the Guardian Council.  In other words, less then one percent of the applicants were allowed to run.  Unsurprising, all the women applicants were disqualified.

The four candidates that were approved by what Khamenei referred to as the regime’s “microscope” are Ahmadinejad, Karoubi, Mousavi and Rezaei.
One just needs to look back in these last four years to get a good idea of Ahmadinejad line of thinking, however the histories of the other three candidates is much more obscure to the world.

Mehdi Karoubi is currently campaigning on a platform of human rights and women rights, though he supports gender apartheid, such as Shariah laws that states a woman’s word is worth half a man’s in the court of law and a woman’s life and limb being worth half as much as a man’s.  When Karoubi was the head of the Foundation for Families of Martyrs he became famous for the various sexual scandals involving widows of the Iran-Iraq war and the sheer amount of corruption in the said foundation.  When Karoubi was the speaker of the majority-reformist parliament during Khatami’s presidency, Khamenei issued an edict that the bill to ease censorship in the press should not be brought to a vote, and Karoubi obliged and removed the bill, even though Karoubi had campaigned on easing of press restrictions.

Mir-Hossein Mousavi, a cousin of Khamenei has worked in the Expediency Council for last twenty years or so.  Mousavi was also responsible for closing the universities immediately after the hijacking of the revolution of 78, to conduct cultural re-education.  During the Iran-Iraq war he served as the Islamic Republic’s prime minister, helping extend the war for 5 long years  even though at a point Iran had taken back all its cities from Iraq and the Arabs were willing to end the war and make huge financial compensations.  Mr. Mousavi presided over mass executions of 80-81 and the dark summer of 1988 where over thirty thousand political prisoners were executed and buried and mass graves.   Given the amount of blood on his hands it’s difficult to not to laugh when Mousavi speaks of creating a human rights council if [s]elected.  As far as his anti-West views go, he stated in 1981 in the magazine Payameh Enghelab that “We are ready to participate within an armed force to fight Israel… We have repeatedly announced that we are ready to have an actual, real and  military presence in Southern Lebanon and on the borders of the occupied Palestinian lands…we believe that with the support of the popular forces in Lebanon we shall be able to gradually find effective and powerful bases in the area for fighting Israel …we believe if the flow of oil in Muslim Lands is in the hands of Muslims and if the ideology of Islam controls the opening or closing of the oil valves we shall be able to bring the World Arrogance to its knees, to strike Israel and to destroy it.”

Mohsen Rezaei is a former chief commander of the Islamic Republic Revolutionary Guard Corp (IRGC) and currently serving as Secretary of Expediency Council.  During his reign as the head of IRGC, he ordered the bombing of Iranian Kurdistan Province in western and north-western Iran.  He even boasted about how he didn’t have room for three Iranian Kurds POWs, and thus simply beheaded them and traveled back with their heads.  Rezaei is wanted by Interpol for connection to the Argentine Jewish center bombing in 1994.

With such a candidate roster, one has to wonder what type of government would let people who have committed crimes against humanity run for public office.  But then one remembers this is the Islamic Republic, having blood on one’s hands is a prerequisite for holding high public office.

As with previous regime [s]elections, we reiterate that the Marze Por Gohar Party does not recognize the Islamic Republic as the legitimate representative of Iran and therefore we will not take any part in the regime’s [s]elections and encourage others to do the same.  Even within the theocratic framework of the Islamic Republic, Iranians have the right to boycott the [s]elections.

The freedom Iranians have earned during the reign of this regime have not come about from working “within the system” and thus voting only serves to give legitimacy to a government which is only answerable to God not Iranians.

Long Live Iran.

Marze Por Gohar Party

US: Islamic Republic can keep nuclear program

Sunday, May 24th, 2009

Well you knew it was coming and finally a senior military official stated as much.

When asked whether the Islamic Republic could keep their nuclear program, Admiral Michael Mullen replied “that’s certainly a possibility“.

While the State Department says that “We want to keep the focus on Iran and what Iran is doing, and what we can do collectively in order to try to persuade Iran to take a different course“.

The two statements taken together basically means “Ok, you win”.

Islamic Republic plagiarizes Ey Iran anthem

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

The Islamic Republic obviously now feels uninhibited, thanks for to the American government, in attacking Iranian identity.

The regime has butchered the “Ey Iran” anthem to a pro-regime piece.

But two can play at that game, let’s see how they like an MPG remake of the Islamic Republic’s national anthem.

Interesting that when the regime mocks the Iranian national anthem the Islamic Republic believes in free speech but when cartoons of Mohammad are published the Islamic Republic goes on a rampage.

Islamic Republic conducts ‘unnecessary executions’

Monday, May 11th, 2009

The Islamic Republic’s judiciary spokesperson declares that there have been a “huge development” in the laws of the regime, which should decrease the number of “unnecessary executions.”

In other words, the regime is executing people just because they can!

Naturally the spokesperson does not explain what “huge” developments in the field of law and order he’s referring to.  However let us not forget that the regime stones males as well as females; perhaps this policy of “we don’t discriminate when it comes to stoning” is the “huge” development that Jamshidi is referring to.

So the next time you read about an execution in Iran, remember the executions are being conducted just because.